Joseph
Islam The
example
was
only
cited
to
explain
what
I
meant
by
circular
argument.
That
is
all.
The
example
itself
is
irrelevant
to
me
as
it
is
one
that
is
based
on
secondary
sources.
That
was
the
point
I
was
making.
I
trust
that
you
will
see
that.
With
regards
transmission
of
the
Quran
that
is a
matter
we
have
already
discussed
on
an
agreed
platform
and
I am
happy
to
revisit
a
topic
(if
you
wish)
that
we
both
felt
was
exhausted.
Furthermore,
as
you
will
have
noted
I
have
never
made
use
of
secondary
sources
to
'prove'
the
'transmission'
of
the
Quran.
If
anything
I
have
strongly
argued
that
secondary
sources
introduce
doubt
as
to
its
transmission.
For
example,
it
is
secondary
sources
such
as
hadith
that
tell
us
that:
-
Verses
of
the
Quran
were
missing
and
a
goat
ate
the
stoning
verse
with
regards
to
adultery
[1]
-
That
the
Prophet
of
God
introduced
the
Satanic
verses
[2]
-
That
Caliph
Uthman
burnt
the
extant
copies
of
the
Quran
[3]
-
That
there
was
a
missing
suckling
verse
(Ten
clear
sucklings
which
made
the
marriage
unlawful,
then
it
was
later
abrogated
(and
substituted)
by
five
sucklings
and
then
was
somehow
removed
or
missed
from
the
Quran
altogether
[4]
-
That
there
was
a
missing
Ibn
Adam
verse
(regarding
Ibn
Adam's
possession
of a
wadi
of
property)
[5]
-
That
there
was
a
missing
'pleasing'
verse
from
the
Quran
(regarding
those
that
were
slain
at
Bi'r
Mauna
which
included
the
verse
"Inform
our
tribe
on
our
behalf
that
we
have
met
with
our
Lord.
He
has
been
well
pleased
with
us
and
has
satisfied
our
desires)
[6]
-
And
many
others,
from
al-Baraa,
verses
that
were
lost
with
dead
Muslims,
cancelled
and
repealed
verses
and
those
forgotten
by
the
Prophet
himself
and
those
lost
by
Quranic
reciters
[7]
Can
you
see
dear
brother
why
I
don't
have
these
discussions
on
Facebook
and
have
a
dedicated
platform
for
this
kind
of
discussion?
Therefore,
please
can
I
once
again,
kindly
and
sincerely,
request
that
you
do
not
post
such
contentions
on
my
personal
Facebook
page
which
you
know
will
lead
to a
debate.
I
have
already
provided
you
with
a
platform
for
discussion.
This
is
also
why
I do
not
write
on
your
wall.
Can
you
at
least
reciprocate
the
sincere
gesture?
Please?
Thank
you
dear
brother
Bassam
Zawadi
REFERENCES
[1]
SUNAN
IBN
MAJAH,
Book
of
Nikaah,
Number
1944,
Hadith
in
Arabic,
[online]
http://hadith.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=192&TOCID=638&BookID=29&PID=1934 [Accessed
13th
April
2011]
[2]
AL
TABARI,
Ta'rikh
Volume
1
[3]
SAHIH
BUKHARI,
Volume
6,
Book
61,
Number
510,
Translator:
M.
Muhsin
Khan.
Source:
University
of
Southern
California
Center
for
Muslim-Jewish
Engagement,
Translation
available
[online]
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/061-sbt.php [Accessed
11th
March
2013]
Such
narrations
have
the
potential
to
open
up
serious
contention
for
the
Shia
that
a
'Usurper'
of
power
had
been
somehow
responsible
for
the
Quran's
preservation
and
therefore
the
true
Quran
had
to
exist
with
their
infallible
Imams.
[4]
SUNAN
IBN
MAJAH,
Book
of
Nikaah,
Number
1944,
Hadith
in
Arabic,
[online]
http://hadith.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=192&TOCID=638&BookID=29&PID=1934 [Accessed
13th
April
2011]
[5]
BURTON.
J,
The
Collection
of
the
Qur'an,
Cambridge
University
Press
1977,
First
published
1977,
First
paperback
edition
1979,
Re-issued
2010,
Pages
82-83,
Note
(31)
and
(32)
quoted.
Note
(31)
-
Burhan
al
Din
al
Baji,
Jawab,
MS
Dar
al
Kutub,
Taimur
majami
no.
207,
f.17.
Note
(32)
Itqan,
pt
2,,
p.25
[6]
BURTON.
J,
The
Collection
of
the
Qur'an,
Cambridge
University
Press
1977,
First
published
1977,
First
paperback
edition
1979,
Re-issued
2010,
Pages
48-49,
Note
(3).
Note
(3)
Ibid.
p26
(from
previous
reference
Itqan,
pt2)
[7]
SAHIH
MUSLIM,
Volume
1,
Book
5,
Book
of
Zakat
(Kitab
al-Zakat)
Number
2286,
Translator:
Abdul
Hamid
Siddiqui,
Source:
University
of
Southern
California
Center
for
Muslim-Jewish
Engagement,
Translation
available
[online]
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/muslim/005-smt.php [Accessed
11th
March
2013]