Peace Optimist,
Thanks for elaborating.
"Cognitive dissonance is a term used in modern psychology to describe the feeling of discomfort when holding two or more conflicting ideas, beliefs, or values. It suggests that we have an inner drive to hold onto all of our beliefs and attitudes to avoid feelings of discomfort and instability. Sometimes people hold onto a belief system that is very strong and the moment they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence that was presented cannot be accepted. When presented with evidence that works against a belief system, it has the potential
Rationalization is one way of the defense system of the nafs. In this sura we see the people use the 'sihr' as an explanation to remove the tension

Thanks for elaborating.
"Cognitive dissonance is a term used in modern psychology to describe the feeling of discomfort when holding two or more conflicting ideas, beliefs, or values. It suggests that we have an inner drive to hold onto all of our beliefs and attitudes to avoid feelings of discomfort and instability. Sometimes people hold onto a belief system that is very strong and the moment they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence that was presented cannot be accepted. When presented with evidence that works against a belief system, it has the potential
to create a very uncomfortable feeling for the individual, this is called cognitive dissonance. A powerful motive to maintain cognitive consistency can give rise to irrational behavior and thoughts. We hold many cognitions about the world and ourselves; when they clash, a discrepancy is created, resulting in a state of tension."
Rationalization is one way of the defense system of the nafs. In this sura we see the people use the 'sihr' as an explanation to remove the tension
