Greetings Good logic,
Here are some of your quotes that I was talking about:
"
Yes ,if you can find the "Original Torah" you would find that it agrees with Qoran." So the original Torah is lost (since you say'if you can find it'), and the Torah we have is corrupted, since it doesn't agree with Quran at some aspects. You don't say it directly, but that's what you imply by saying this phrase. Furthermore, simply by using the term "the original Torah", you are showing us that you believe there are two Torahs: one original and one false. If anyone can understand these sayings of yours in a different manner, then please elucidate me, because that's the only meaning I get from thse words of yours.
Next, to my surprise, you say: "
Neither am I saying that today s Torah is different from the past Torah." This is where you lost me: Is today's Torah different from past Torah or not?
"
Please provide me with the "Torah" that Qoran is speaking about. Where is it?" Here you go again with the ''one original and one false Torah'' again. The Quran answers this question, for example, in 5:43: "But why do they come to you for decision,
when they have (their own) Torah before them? therein is the (plain) command of God; yet even after that, they would turn away. For they are not People of Faith." Does this ring a bell?
"
But the bible is not the Torah." Absolutely correct! The Bible contains nearly 66 books, and the Torah is made up of only 5 of them: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy.
Anyways, I don't want to go back to things already mentioned in my posts or Duster's posts, and regarding the changes between Torah and Quran, I talked about it in a previous post.
I'm trying to understand you, but you're constantly changing your words, so you end up confusing us. If I'd be the only one confused, I'd assume it's my fault, but since I'm not the only one experiencing it, it is your way of expression or understanding that's at fault.
Selam, God bless you too