Dear Student and Anjum,
As-salamu alaykum
I will attempt to answer both your questions briefly.
With what has been shared, that is why it is imperative that every sane minded Muslim with assets to their name commit to a will. The Quran arguably, also supports this sentiment in general. This includes you, me and those around us.
Furthermore, it is the responsibility of the testator to formulate this will and address in their will their desires as to how they would like any left-over portions (if applicable) distributed so that there are no disputes after their death. It is also their responsibility to account for the needy, orphans and others (charitable causes) in the same manner that they would think of providing for their own offspring (4-8).
Dear Student – Yes, you are correct in my humble opinion that in the absence of a primary will (which may in fact simply be shares attributed as per the Quran with additional requests / bequests, even to deal with left over portions as discussed), the automatic shares as per the Quran will take effect.
If wealth is left over (and unfortunately has not been dealt by the testator before their demise), then the Quran remains silent on its distribution.
The appointed executor(s) of the will must then decide what must be done with the remaining wealth, whether it is to be distributed to the neediest within the immediate kinship, passed to charity or for the government to distribute to wider society. This does not mean that automatically those that have already inherited will re-share the remainder.
This is why it is imperative that all testators share their desires as to the distribution of their wealth during their lifetimes. I have noted many to criticise elders for not having written a will, but when I have questioned them, they have not written one either. This has always begged the question from me, how do you know who will pass away first? Death can be upon any of us at any time.
Finally, you are correct that a will be unquranic if it is not done with a sense of fairness and justice and in a manner that causes harm or results in undue favouritism (ghayra mudarrin – 4:12).
Dear Anjum – You seemed to have asked me why God has stipulated the rules as He has. Where one can spend many pages scratching the surface of the limitless abundance of God’s wisdom as to why that may be, a detailed discussion would be outside the scope of this response.
However, I do not believe that there is gender favouritism as that would be an allegation against God (May God forbid). For example, when I read that when the parents are the only heirs, a mother gets twice that of a father of their child’s inheritance (4:11), for the same reason, I do not interpret that instruction against men. The protection appears to be for the female. Similarly, it may be an idea to see how the female inherits collectively and how the Quran understands the primary responsibility of maintenance and provision for the male.
However, it remains your parent’s responsibility to deal with their will appropriately and give clear direction what is to be done with any wealth that is to be left over. Similarly it is your responsibility to deal with your wealth. They may deem it fit to apportion that accordingly and this remains their prerogative.
I hope this helps, God willing.
Regards,
Joseph