Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
General Discussions / Re: Islamic calendar
« Last post by alipomustaqimo on June 26, 2022, 02:06:02 PM »
I think this is the strongest case for Islamic calendar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG64f4Q7fvQ "The Hijri Calendar and the Lost Month of Ramadan"
92
General Discussions / Is Kharaj (Land Tax) Sanctioned in the Quran?
« Last post by alipomustaqimo on June 26, 2022, 02:03:52 PM »
Assalam, I would like to know whether Kharaj is sanctioned in the Quran. Kharaj is a fee imposed on conquered lands. The cultivators of a conquered land have to pay a certain fees to the State. This question is also related as to whether Quran allows any taxation at all.

More info on kharaj as explained by Mohammed Malkawi in the book "Fall of Capitalism & Rise of Islam":

Throughout the history of the Islamic state, the largest source of
income for the state has been the revenue generated from the property
ownership of land called Kharaj (the lands annexed to the Islamic state
through war). Kharaj literally means output. The term kharaj replaced the
term fai’i, which was used for the land annexed without a fight. Abu Obaid
narrated in his book Al-Amwal on the authority of Az-Zuhri that Prophet
Mohammad (PBUH) considered the lands of Bahrain after its conquest a
land of Kharaj even after the people in Bahrain had converted to Islam.116
Kharaj land is defined as a land added to the territory of the Islamic state
and whose ownership belongs to the state. The state grants the right to
use the land for farming or development in exchange for a predefined fee.
The fee is due to be paid by the user of the land whether he was able to
benefit from the land or not. The fee is not in exchange for the product of
the land; it is in exchange for the right to use it. If the user of the land is a
Muslim, he still has to pay the Zakah portion of the products. If the user of
the Kharaj land is not a Muslim, he only has to pay the Kharaj fee.

During the reign of Caliph Harun Ar-Rasheed,117 the land of the
Islamic state was enormous due to the expansion of the state into Africa,
Central and East Asia, and well into Europe. The caliph requested his
chief judge Abu Yousuf 118 to write a book detailing the rules related to the
wealth associated with the land of Kharaj, and to explain the various ways
of spending the Kharaj money. Following the footsteps of Abu Yousuf,
several other books on the subject of Kharaj were compiled.119 The famous
book of Hadeeth compiled by Abu Dawoud, known as Sunan Abu Dawoud,
contains a section titled “The Book of Kharaj.” Referring to the huge land
of the caliphate state, Harun Ar-Rasheed once addressed a passing cloud
over the city of Baghdad saying, “You may drop your rain wherever you
wish; your Kharaj will eventually come back to me.”

laws of Kharaj. Abu Yousuf narrated in his Kharaj book the following
incident. In the year AH 16, the Muslim armies of the caliph Omar
occupied a huge land in Iraq after the battle of Qadisiyyah. Prominent
Muslim companions and army generals Bilal Al-Habasihi, Abderrahman
Bin Awf, and Zubair Bin Al-Awwam divided part of the occupied land
among the fighting soldiers. They treated the occupied land as spoils
of war and thought to divide it among the fighters according to Islamic
method for dealing with spoils of war. The caliph Omar had another
opinion. He wanted the land to remain a property of the state and convert
it into a land of Kharaj. After consulting with his advisers in Medina, Omar
proclaimed,

"I want to keep the land of Iraq and let the people who currently
own it continue utilizing it in exchange for a Kharaj fee. The Kharaj
money will be for all Muslims including the fighters, their offspring,
and the generations to come. I want the Kharaj money to pay for the
cost of securing the long borders, and protecting the large cities of Sham,
Jazirah, Basra, and Egypt. If we divide the land among the fighters
now, the state will not be able to pay the salaries for the soldiers who will
have to protect the land and the borders."

But for this opinion to become a law, Omar had to support his
proclamation with an evidence from the Quran or the Sunnah of the
Prophet, especially since the Prophet in a previous occasion did distribute
the land among the fighters (the land of Khaibar, for example).
After consulting prominent scholars in Medina, Omar used verses
7-10 from Surah Al-Hashr (chapter 59) in the Quran to prove his point.

The verses talk about the rules related to spoils of war including the land.
Following is the text of the verses:
[59:7] What Allah gave as booty (Fai’) to His Messenger from
the people of the townships—it is for Allah, His Messenger, the kindred
of Messenger Muhammad, the orphans, Al-Masakeen (the poor), and
the wayfarer, in order that wealth may not remain a fortune circulated
between the rich ones among you. And whatsoever the Messenger gives
you, take it; and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it). And fear
Allah; verily, Allah is Severe in punishment.

This verse establishes the principle that the returns of war are for the
Messenger to use and distribute among the most needy ones (orphans,
poor, wayfarers). The Messenger in this case is referred to in his capacity
as a head of the state; the spiritual and religious aspect is covered by the
part which refers the booty to Allah.
Furthermore, this verse established a major principle in the political
economy in Islam which guards against the accumulation of wealth in the
hands of the richest ones in the society. This is reflected in the portion of
the verse which reads, “In order that it may not remain a fortune circulated
between the rich ones among you.”

The second verse in this series further describes the groups of people
who are entitled to receive the dividends of the booty and proceeds of war.
The first group is the poor among the Muslims who migrated from Mecca
to Medina leaving all their wealth behind. They receive a portion of the
spoils of war to help them get over the poverty status they gained as a
result of the sacrifices they made.
[59:8] (And there is also a share in this booty) for the poor
emigrants, who were expelled from their homes and their property,
seeking Bounties from Allah and to please Him, and helping Allah (i.e.
helping His religion) and His Messenger. Such are indeed the truthful
(to what they say).

The next verse describes the second group of people who are to receive
a portion of the proceeds of war. This group belongs to the Muslims in
Medina who subjected their wealth and property to sanctions imposed by
Quraish and the Jews in Medina. They also shared their wealth with their
fellow brethren who migrated from Mecca. For all of these sacrifices, they
deserve to be compensated in order to keep them out of poverty.

[59:9] And (it is also for) those who, before them, had homes (in
Medina) and had adopted the Faith, love those who emigrate to them,
and have no jealousy in their hearts for that which they have been given
(from the booty), and give the emigrants preference over themselves even
though they were in need of that. And whosoever is saved from his own
covetousness, such are they who will be the successful.

The next verse is what caught the attention of Caliph Omar. It describes
a group of people who are entitled to receive part of the proceeds of war,
including the land, but this group is yet to exist. The group belongs to future
generations who love and appreciate all what has been accomplished by
the first generation of immigrants and hosts. Omar declared that this verse
had established the right to own part of the returns of war for the future
generations of Muslims. The fact that the verse did not specify a time
period in which the group would live implies that all Muslim generations
without any limit are entitled to receive dividends from the land gained
through the war.
[59:10] And (it is also for) those who come after them and say:
“Our Lord! Forgive us and our brethren who have preceded us in Faith,
and put not in our hearts any hatred against those who have believed.
Our Lord! You are indeed full of kindness, Most Merciful.

Citing these verses, Omar told the soldiers and generals who were in
favor of distributing the land that the only way he can guarantee that the
third group mentioned in verse [59:10] receives their rights is to treat the
land as a Kharaj land; this way the wealth generated from the Kharaj fees
will return to the state treasury. Then the state will spend this money in the
best interest of the public. The companions of the Prophet unanimously
agreed with Omar’s verdict and this has become the law. Abu Yousuf
narrated in the Kharaj book that the Kharaj revenues from the southern
part of Iraq during the reign of Omar reached one hundred million dirhams
(a dirham is equal to 2.98 gram silver).
The majority of the land in the Muslim world is considered a Kharaj
land. Examples of lands which are not subject to Kharaj include the islands
of Malay, Indonesia, and the Arabian Peninsula. The Kharaj land in the
Muslim world is extraordinarily large. The Kharaj revenues from this huge
land are a significant source of income for the Islamic state.


What do you think? It seems to go against freedom of property in as enshrined in Quran 4:29 "O you who believe! Eat not up your property among yourselves unjustly except it be a trade amongst you, by mutual consent. And do not kill yourselves (nor kill one another). Surely, Allah is Most Merciful to you. "

But that one could say that the conquered annexed land belongs to the state, but why should it belong to the state when the enemies do not use the land to fight in the war, as opposed to swords and shields which are used in wars. The land never belonged to the enemy state in the first place. It belonged to a private individual.
93
General Discussions / Re: Islamic calendar
« Last post by Student on June 22, 2022, 02:11:52 PM »
Thanks Wakas  :)
94
General Discussions / Re: Islamic calendar
« Last post by Wakas on May 16, 2022, 07:26:51 PM »
I would say use whatever is more practicable wherever one is and what one has available to them.
95
General Discussions / Islamic calendar
« Last post by Student on May 01, 2022, 11:08:27 AM »
Salaamun Alaykum,

Which method do you guys think is more closer, in our era, to the Quran's guidance:

  • Traditional/local Moonsighting
  • Traditional/global Moonsighting
  • Moonsighting with Telescope
  • Astronomically calculated calendar
The last one is adopted by many Sunni organizations around the western part of the world with following conditions:
The conjunction has occurred before sunset
The crescent or the moon sets after sunset where there is possibility of visibility.
The angle between the crescent and the horizon at sunset is at least 5 degrees.
The distance between the sun and the moon is at least 8 degrees.

The article below differs from above by without regard to angle and distance so long as the crescent is present in the sky (above horizon) before sunset:
https://www.quranaloneislam.org/ramadan-2022

Truly appreciate if you share views with your reasoning.

Thank you
96
Assalamu-alaikum,

The Qur'an apart from the ministries of Prophet Moses and Jesus(peace be upon them), also describes that of Prophet Noah, Ibrahim, David(Daud) who was granted the text of Zabur( believed to be the equivalent of Psalms), Solomon, Lot, Zachariah, Joseph(Yusuf), Shuaib, Dhul-Qarnaiyn, Dhul-Khifil, Issac and Ishmael(peace be upon them. All Prophets of Allah SWT.
97
General Discussions / Allahamdullilah
« Last post by Kaifa on April 30, 2022, 04:39:25 AM »
Assalamu-alaikum,

I have gotten permanently blocked from the IslamicBoard message site by the moderator Hamza Asadullah for raising my objection on Mufti Menk's preachings on zina from his video entitled 'Caught your spouse cheating- what to do about it?' from over a year ago. In it he advocates that wives should keep quiet and forgive their husbands and not disclose their zina to anyone. He appears to have later modified reposts of the talk with the same title but his message nontheless insinuates that this not a matter to be brought to the attention of a would be Islamic nation's authorities to enact the punishment of known zina, but instead to be 'hushed up' so as to perversely keep the marriage going.  His stance is clearly deeply hypocritical and alarming as his later modifications indicate that he has attempted to cover up his original advice and especially because it is in complete opposition to the Qur'an/Allah's Expectations on ensuring that the punishment for zina is enforced (and that too without lightening the firmness of the whipping!).
Those words describing the punishment for zina are not the result of a conspiracy of extremists or masochists whispering into Allah's (figurative) Ear! They are Indeed Allah's Own Words Demonstrating His Standards of Justice. Given the lax social culture that muslim communities find themselves in maybe Munafiq  Menk has sought to appease them and/or maybe he hearkens back to the abusive male-controlling nature of many hadith/sunnah claims.
By highlighting this discovery about Menk on the IslamicBoard site Asadullah responded by labelling me as 'hateful' and 'to not think with emotion' which I found to defensive and prejudiced. One (myself) doesn't need to have had any personal encounter with zina to understand its widespread destructive and chaotic impact on human society! 
I have shared this with other QM forum perusers to enlighten them on a very disappointing  experience with a supposedly 'mainstream' muslim discussion site  May AllahSWT grant all steadfast truth-seeking believers and those at risk of being astray His Hidayah and Grace.
98
The Quran teaches about the lives of those who lived before Muhammad. It focuses greatly on Moses, Joseph and Mary, and to a lesser extent, Nuh, Lot, Abraham, and so on. A proper teaching of Islam relies on an understanding of these historical personalities.

As a side note: How different from traditionalist Islam where the stories of those in the Quran are given secondary importance compared to the life of the prophet himself.

I am unfamiliar with the previous books of God. Out of curiosity I would like to know which personalities did God use to teach previous ministries (e.g. the ministries of Jesus and Moses). Are any of these personalities not mentioned in the Quran?

99
General Discussions / Re: Suggested amendment to "Book Worship"
« Last post by Hamzeh on February 07, 2022, 01:29:38 PM »
Wa 3alykum assalam

Quote
It has always seemed to me that the understanding of the Quran should be based on original intent (or Originalism).

Yes brother Shahmatt. Any interpretation or definitions of words should be understood from the eyes of those who were receiving the Scripture. So if definitions or meanings of words have changed in the span of time then one would need to consider what the word meant at the time the Quran was revealed or at least as close as possible to it. This is the most reasonable and most logic.

Thanks for sharing

Peace
100
General Discussions / Suggested amendment to "Book Worship"
« Last post by Shahmatt on February 07, 2022, 12:20:58 AM »
Assalamu alaikum,

I refer to the article "Book Worship" which I read with great interest.

I noted that in the conclusion of the article the Quran is described as a "living, breathing document."

I understand that this phrase is used to describe the U.S Constitution in the present day. I quote the following from Wikipedia on an article on Originalism, which opposes the Living Constitution (living, breathing document) idea:

"In the context of United States law, originalism is a concept regarding the interpretation of the Constitution that asserts that all statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding "at the time it was adopted". This concept views the Constitution as stable from the time of enactment and that the meaning of its contents can be changed only by the steps set out in Article Five.[1] This notion stands in contrast to the concept of the Living Constitution, which asserts that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the context of current times and political identities, even if such interpretation is different from the original interpretations of the document.[2][3]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Originalism

It has always seemed to me that the understanding of the Quran should be based on original intent (or Originalism). If such is the case I suggest the omission of "living, breathing document" in the conclusion of the "Book Worship" to avoid confusion. Thank you.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]