181
General Discussions / Re: Happy Ramzan Guys...:)
« on: June 15, 2016, 03:17:15 AM »
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ! 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
182
General Discussions / Re: Spend in God's Cause?
« on: June 15, 2016, 03:12:50 AM »
It is "until the night"(إِلَى اللَّيْلِ) which is stated.
This might be useful to you (all the mentions of night in the Book).
This too might be useful.
This might be useful to you (all the mentions of night in the Book).
This too might be useful.
183
General Discussions / Re: homosexuality and 5:33 ?
« on: June 15, 2016, 12:36:56 AM »
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ,
There is also the description of Lot, and the people of Lot, and this description doesn't state that Lot punished these people, right?
There is also the description of Lot, and the people of Lot, and this description doesn't state that Lot punished these people, right?
184
General Discussions / Re: malik or maalik in "Fatiha", different recitations ?
« on: June 15, 2016, 12:23:02 AM »
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ,
Do you know Arabic, and Arabic conjugation well?
Do you know Arabic, and Arabic conjugation well?
185
Resources and Information Portal / Re: Learning Arabic
« on: June 12, 2016, 08:12:10 PM »
What would "intermediate" be?
186
General Discussions / Re: 6136
« on: June 12, 2016, 01:18:45 AM »
And those state, "This is for the God ," with their assertion, " and this is for our associates." But what is for their "associates" does not reach the God , while what is for Allah - this reaches their "associates."
187
General Discussions / Re: malik or maalik in "Fatiha", different recitations ?
« on: June 12, 2016, 01:09:34 AM »
The word مَالِكِ is just mentioned once. The word مَلِكِ however is mentioned 4 times (this includes الْمَلِكِ). Is this what you meant?
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ
188
General Discussions / Re: malik or maalik in "Fatiha", different recitations ?
« on: June 11, 2016, 10:55:53 PM »
That's just how it's translated. So the letters م ل ك mean with "to possess", and the words derived from them have to do with "possession" (or "what is yours"). Again I think مَالِكِ is an adjective, and مَلِكِ isn't. And I think it's how the word's used that people derive a more particular interpretation of what the word means, and that's how you get مَلِكِ to be translated in a manner, and مَالِكِ in another.
Same reason people in Australia don't pronounce all words the same as people in the US perhaps? As to what is more appropriate?
The word is مَالِكِ, how you pronounce that is up to you.
And I'm unsure what you mean, if you mean of the words مَالِكِ, and مَلِكِ, then no.
Same reason people in Australia don't pronounce all words the same as people in the US perhaps? As to what is more appropriate?
The word is مَالِكِ, how you pronounce that is up to you.
And I'm unsure what you mean, if you mean of the words مَالِكِ, and مَلِكِ, then no.
189
General Discussions / 6136
« on: June 11, 2016, 09:12:35 PM »
from 6:136:
فَقَالُوا هَذَا لِلَّهِ بِزَعْمِهِمْ وَهَذَا لِشُرَكَائِنَا فَمَا كَانَ لِشُرَكَائِهِمْ فَلَا يَصِلُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَمَا كَانَ لِلَّهِ فَهُوَ يَصِلُ إِلَى شُرَكَائِهِمْ
(And those state, "This is for the God ," with their assertion, " and this is for our associates." But what is for their "associates" does not reach the God , while what is for Allah - this reaches their "associates.")
What do you all uneaten this to mean? How does that which those state "This is for the God" reach their associates? (in what manner)
فَقَالُوا هَذَا لِلَّهِ بِزَعْمِهِمْ وَهَذَا لِشُرَكَائِنَا فَمَا كَانَ لِشُرَكَائِهِمْ فَلَا يَصِلُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَمَا كَانَ لِلَّهِ فَهُوَ يَصِلُ إِلَى شُرَكَائِهِمْ
(And those state, "This is for the God ," with their assertion, " and this is for our associates." But what is for their "associates" does not reach the God , while what is for Allah - this reaches their "associates.")
What do you all uneaten this to mean? How does that which those state "This is for the God" reach their associates? (in what manner)
190
General Discussions / Re: HIKMA means indeed HADITHS and not WISDOM
« on: June 09, 2016, 11:42:42 PM »Quote
However, Nora, I'm not afraid.
Perhaps you should be, as the command to fear God is mentioned throughout.
from 3:102:
اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ حَقَّ تُقَاتِهِ
(Fear the God, [as it is the] truth that he [is to be] feared)
191
General Discussions / Re: Does it matter who Abu Lahab is?
« on: June 09, 2016, 09:26:33 PM »
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ
192
General Discussions / Re: correct understanding of 22:15
« on: June 09, 2016, 09:23:37 PM »
سَلَامٌ عَلَيْكُمْ,
Could someone (with evidence) state which of these translations is right; "From [the people] is he who assumes that the God won't help him in the Here, and Hereafter; then for him is to extend a reason to the Heavens", or "then for him is a reason to extend to the Heavens"?
Could someone (with evidence) state which of these translations is right; "From [the people] is he who assumes that the God won't help him in the Here, and Hereafter; then for him is to extend a reason to the Heavens", or "then for him is a reason to extend to the Heavens"?
193
General Discussions / Does it matter who Abu Lahab is?
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:49:19 PM »
Mentioned in:
111:1:
بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ تَبَّتْ يَدَا أَبِي لَهَبٍ وَتَبَّ
111:2:
مَا أَغْنَى عَنْهُ مَالُهُ وَمَا كَسَبَ
111:3:
سَيَصْلَى نَارًا ذَاتَ لَهَبٍ
111:4:
وَامْرَأَتُهُ حَمَّالَةَ الْحَطَبِ
111:5:
فِي جِيدِهَا حَبْلٌ مِنْ مَسَدٍ
And what can we take from all of this?
111:1:
بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ تَبَّتْ يَدَا أَبِي لَهَبٍ وَتَبَّ
111:2:
مَا أَغْنَى عَنْهُ مَالُهُ وَمَا كَسَبَ
111:3:
سَيَصْلَى نَارًا ذَاتَ لَهَبٍ
111:4:
وَامْرَأَتُهُ حَمَّالَةَ الْحَطَبِ
111:5:
فِي جِيدِهَا حَبْلٌ مِنْ مَسَدٍ
And what can we take from all of this?
194
General Discussions / Re: regarding 22:60-61 and 25:51
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:33:00 PM »
And such as 35:24 for reference.
195
General Discussions / Re: regarding 22:60-61 and 25:51
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:30:39 PM »
Perhaps it is to do with how we're often like "what is the reason for this, this, this", and this is our Gods demonstration that the "reason" can be whatever he decides, even if it seems unreasonable?