Salam Seraphina,
In my humble opinion, I believe that these kinds of issues are not that straightforward. There is a big room for wishful thinking and selective perception. Furthermore, I'm sure that if you search for a rebuttal for this claim, you will probably find one. (Probably by a non-Muslim and probably convincing).
I'm asking because this is often being used as a fact to prove the equality of the ahadith with the holy Quran: science confirms the facts mentioned in Quran
Furthermore, I find the premise of proving the divine origin of the Quran by simply relying on the scientific consistencies it has with modern science questionable. Scientific miracles alone, in my opinion, do not prove a lot. There has been scientific breakthroughs in ancient civilizations before the Quran.
However, this does not mean that the scientific references in the Quran have no purpose. On the contrary, I believe that it can increase the faith of a believer. (But, arguably faith was already present before diving deeper in these references from studying the main arguments the Quran presents.)
If one is to proof the divinity of the Quran, I believe one must take the Quran as a whole, including its main arguments and "scientific miracles". The latter alone, in my humble view, is not sufficient. Which is why I find it hard to prove the divinity of a Hadith using this line of thinking.
Hope this helps.
Peace.