Peace to All
The argument of Bro Lobotomize94, is same as the argument of flat Earth. People always use Q[88:20] to prove Quran supports Earth is flat. Here is what it says:
1 - Do they not
look at the camels, how they were created? Q[88:17]
2 - And at the Sky, how it is raised high? Q[88:18]
3 - And at the Mountains, how they are fixed firm? Q[88:19]
4 - And on the earth how was it outstretched? Q[88:20]
The verses clearly not talking about modern men orbiting the Earth and watching from a space station, rather Arabs with their camels in a desert. Now, what do they see if they look?
1 - If they look at their right or left, they will see their camels.
2 - If they look above, they will see a blue sky.
3 - If they look around, they probably see mountains.
4 - If they look below, they will see the ground/surface of the earth or the desert.
Translating the word "الارض" to Earth (with capital E) is not really honest thing to do, because the Arab man can't see it, he can only see the surface of it not the whole planet.
As for Geocentric of the universe, imagine this:
1 - Muhammad comes and claims, I'm messenger of God. People: You're a liar, but maybe!
2 - Muhammad who is already a liar in the eyes of his people, claims and makes a clear statement that earth is a planet. People: You're a liar and we have no doubt about it!
As for 1, Muhammad can provide some arguments and convince his people, because this is his job.
As for 2, Muhammad can not prove his statement and he shouldn't have to, because this is not his job. The difference between a scientist and a prophet/messenger is like a hardware specialist and a software developer, respectively.